Amazon.com Widgets
Home » , , , » Apple iMac 2012 Review Hands-on

Apple iMac 2012 Review Hands-on

Written By Mark Antalusya on December 2, 2012 | 6:29 AM

Apple iMac 2012 - You could say that out of all the products Apple has announced in the last few years, its line of desktops have been, well, the least sexy. New iPad? Ahhhh! New iPhone? Where do I line up? But a new desktop? Eh. In a world where everything is focused on the mobile and where ultrathin laptops suffice as one's main computer, the large and in charge desktops tend to be ignored.

But there's no ignoring Apple's new 21.5-inch and 27-inch iMac, which go on sale today.

Apple’s 2012 iMac has arrived in-stores and on the SlashGear test bench, first in 21.5-inch form and then the 27-inch behemoth following on in December. Borrowing design cues from Apple’s portable range and debuting new construction techniques never before seen in desktop computing, the new iMac also keeps Apple in the front of the pack for performance, with a fresh array of Intel quadcore processors, NVIDIA graphics, and some storage magic in the shape of Fusion Drive.
Apple iMac 2012 image
Apple iMac 2012 (ABC News)

There’s a mixture of engineering and design magic that goes into making the 2012 iMac look so much slimmer than its predecessors. While the last-gen model had blunt edges, Apple has taken a leaf from the MacBook aesthetic and pared the edges down to a narrow taper of only 5mm: although the back actually bows out to accommodate the electronics, a casual glance makes it look like a significantly narrower computer than before

There’s a downside to that design decision, however, which is that you lose the integrated optical drive. Given Apple’s trajectory with regards optical media as a whole – ditching DVD burners from the MacBook Pro and pushing digital media hard on the iPhone and iPad, with no interest in Blu-ray as a stopgap – that’s no great surprise, but we can see it being more of a frustration to desktop users than their mobile counterparts. It’s particularly annoying if you’d got into the habit of using your iMac as an all-in-one DVD player, since the sizable displays make for excellent kitchen, bedroom, or study sets. That being said, Apple does offers a USB SuperDrive for $79 should you need it.

Still, what Apple has accommodated is probably of more interest to most users, and the 2012 iMac doesn’t demand a sacrifice in performance for the design. The basic processor in the 21.5-inch is a 2.7GHz quadcore Core i5, with a 2.9GHz Core i5 and a 3.1GHz Core i7 both options; the larger, 27-inch iMac which will arrive in December starts off with the 2.9GHz Core i5, with a 3.2GHz Core i5 and 3.4GHz Core i7 optional. 8GB of DDR3 memory is standard across the board, though it’s only on the 27-inch model that you can upgrade it yourself; if you want the maximum 16GB in the smaller iMac you’ll need to pay Apple to install it for you (the 27-inch can be specified with up to 32GB).

All-in-one computing used to mean average graphics performance, but Apple has opted for a range of NVIDIA GeForce chips to keep things moving on-screen. The entry-level 21.5-inch gets the GT 640M with 512MB of dedicated GDDR5 memory, with the more expensive spec version stepping up to the GT 650M. Keeping the 27-inch ticking over is the GTX 660M, with 512MB, while the GTX 675MX with 1GB and the GTX 680MX with 2GB, are the higher-spec options. It’s early days, but the performance we’ve seen from both CPU and GPU has been silky smooth.

There were some hopes for Retina-class graphics on the 2012 iMac, but instead things stick with the same 1920 x 1080 (21.5-inch) and 2560 x 1440 (27-inch) resolutions of before. The panels themselves are different, however, using the same innovative full optical lamination as seen on the iPhone and iPad though boosted up to desktop scale. In short, Apple takes a thinner LCD and bonds it directly to the cover glass, doing away with the traditional 2mm gap in-between (which Apple says reduces glare and reflections up to 75-percent, though if you’re working with the sun directly over your shoulder, it can still get a little annoying) for a picture that looks almost like it’s swimming on the very surface of the display.

A Machine to Display
No, really, no one will ignore it. Even if you aren't a tech enthusiast, this is a machine -- or perhaps sculpture -- you can admire. Just 5mm thick at its edges, the profile of the computer has been trimmed significantly. It's like one of those drastic before-and after-Weight Watchers commercials -- the new iMac obviously being the after. The way after. (Apple says the computer's volume has been reduced 40 percent.)

The guts of the computer sit in a curved, rounded area on the back, making most of the aluminum system look like just a thin display. It's amazingly thin, especially when you think that this isn't just a display like Apple's Thunderbolt display -- this is one of the fastest computers you can buy.

Apple did drop the optical drive on this model -- so no playing DVDs. It does still have an SD card slot, four USB 3.0 ports, two Thunderbolt ports, a MiniDisplay jack, and an Ethernet jack.

While this may be the prettiest all-in-one you can keep on the desk at your house or your cubicle or store (I see a lot of iMacs at small stores), it will actually be the display that you spend the most time looking at. Let me rephrase that: It will actually be the display you don't STOP looking at. The 27-inch 2560 x 1440 display is more eye-pleasing than ever before (the 21.5-inch version has a 1920 x 1080 resolution). While the resolution is still the same on both, Apple has gone to the lengths to apply a new lamination process, bonding the screen and a new coating in a way that reduces reflection by 75 percent.

The result is a uniform viewing experience with much less glare. Even with the sun pouring in from my windows this morning I didn't have to adjust the angle of the display to see all my open programs.

Whether Apple will ever make its own TV remains to be seen, but with the 27-inch iMac with its silver aluminum frame sitting in my apartment, I was consistently drawn away from my 40-inch 1080p TV. Maybe that says something about my TV, but it also says something about Apple's ability to make stunning displays. Looking at photos and HD video on this screen is an immersive experience -- colors are rich and in some images it actually looked as if objects were popping out because of the level of detail. It's not considered a Retina Display (perhaps one day it will get one), but it's hard to imagine it getting even sharper.

Apple iMac 2012 Powerful Insides
The last part of the experience is how it actually works as a computer. As you can imagine, my review unit's quad-core 3.4GHz Intel Core i7 processor, 8GB of RAM, Nvidia graphics, and 1TB Fusion drive was able to run the Mountain Lion operating system, several programs (Microsoft Outlook running in Citrix, Tweetdeck, iTunes, Apple's Mail), an HD YouTube video, and a Chrome browser with over 20 webpage tabs open, all with a lot of energy to spare.

The Fusion Drive is an interesting development for Apple -- it takes a fast flash drive and puts it together with a slower but larger regular spinning hard drive. The result is that applications open quickly and overall performance improves, but you still have the space you need for all your files.

Apple iMac 2012 Touchpad, But No Touch
Included in every big iMac box is Apple's wireless keyboard. You can choose between the Magic Mouse and the Magic Trackpad. All instantly pair with the computer via Bluetooth 4.0, but I'd really suggest getting the trackpad. Mountain Lion works best when you take advantage of the gestures -- swiping four fingers upward to see all your open apps in Mission Control, swiping from the right to left to show the Notification Center, etc.

All that has made me wonder, though: why, with this generation of iMacs, has Apple not taken the touch-screen plunge? When my girlfriend first saw it, she actually touched the screen. I asked why, and she said, "I wanted to see if they had done that yet."

Her reaction makes sense, especially since so many of the competing all-in-one desktops have touch screens. Of course, Steve Jobs' answer was always that people don't want to hold up their arms vertically -- it's "ergonomically terrible," he once said. That might eventually change for Apple -- it certainly changed its tune on a smaller iPad, which Jobs had pooh-poohed for a long time -- but it also wouldn't quite be Apple to throw a touch screen on top of its Desktop operating system.

But even if today's iMac doesn't have a touch screen or a higher resolution display, it's still one of the best -- if not the best -- all-in-one out there. Dell's $1,399 XPS One 27, which has a a 27-inch IPS display and Blu-ray drive, is also a good option if you're looking for a Windows 8 touch all-in-one. And, as you might expect, you will pay more for Apple's version. The 21.5-inch iMac starts at $1,299 and the 27-inch version at $1,799. And to get those Fusion Drives you have to pay at least an extra $250.

The price aside, if you're in need of an iMac upgrade or you are considering a new desktop for the home or office, the new iMacs are worth a very long, hard stare. This isn't just another "eh" upgrade. This is a desktop with as much sex appeal as the iPad and iPhone.

0 komentar:

Post a Comment